This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Free stock research for 1,100+ companies on 17 exchanges. Build a screen by tapping cards, then rank by moat, DCF fair value and quality. Get 3 AI picks with the reasoning shown. Follow legendary investors through real SEC 13F filings, see what politicians disclosed buying, and X-ray your own portfolio. Free, no account: 30 ready-made screens, 20 studies built from 107,302 SEC holdings, 140 guides with simulators, 6 calculators. Every screen prints its exact criteria, and when it is wrong.
Maker here. I built StockTrick because of one thing that kept annoying me: every stock screener shows you a ranked list and hides how it was built. You get a score of 74 and no way to know what went into it, or when it would be wrong.
So the rule for the whole site is that nothing is a black box. All 30 screens print their exact criteria, and each one also prints the circumstances in which that screen gives you the wrong answer. The 140 guides are free with no account and no email, and every one has a simulator you can drag until it breaks. The risk-of-ruin one is my favourite: set a 55% win rate, so a genuinely positive edge, then push the bet size up and watch how reliably you still go broke.
The part I did not expect: we ran 20 studies on 107,302 SEC 13F holdings, and one of them is an audit of our own data that concludes three of the quarters we hold are not what they claim to be. Publishing that felt bad for about a day, then felt like the only honest option.
The best finding was that the standard way people read 13F filings is broken. Everyone measures the change in market value of a holding, but value moves when the price moves, so a fund that traded nothing looks like it sold. We found 102 companies where the usual method gives you the opposite of the truth. Only the share count is honest.
Genuinely want to be told where the data is wrong. That is the single most useful thing anyone can give me today.
The card-based screen builder is genuinely fun to use, way more intuitive than wrestling with a traditional stock screener. The DCF fair value ranking is a nice touch for a free tool, though I'd want to dig into how those valuations are calculated before trusting them.
About StockTrick on Product Hunt
“Screen stocks, follow the smart money, free”
StockTrick was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 2 comments, placing #126 on the daily leaderboard. Free stock research for 1,100+ companies on 17 exchanges. Build a screen by tapping cards, then rank by moat, DCF fair value and quality. Get 3 AI picks with the reasoning shown. Follow legendary investors through real SEC 13F filings, see what politicians disclosed buying, and X-ray your own portfolio. Free, no account: 30 ready-made screens, 20 studies built from 107,302 SEC holdings, 140 guides with simulators, 6 calculators. Every screen prints its exact criteria, and when it is wrong.
StockTrick was featured in Fintech (47.2k followers), Investing (26.7k followers) and Education (78.8k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 55.8k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted StockTrick?
StockTrick was hunted by Warrick Campbell. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how StockTrick stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.