This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
BotBugger
Two AI engines hunt bugs — and cross-check each other
Hi Product Hunt 👋
I'm Daniel, a solo dev from Switzerland. Botbugger started as my own QA ritual: before shipping, I'd run my code past two different AI tools and only trust a bug when both agreed. The second opinion caught things the first missed — and, just as importantly, threw out the confident-but-wrong ones.
The problem with a single AI reviewer is noise. It'll hand you ten "critical" issues, and half are hallucinated. You end up debugging the reviewer instead of your code.
Botbugger's idea is simple: don't trust one AI — make two check each other.
Here's how it works:
Point it at a Git repo or a live website URL.
Claude Code and Codex analyze it independently — no shared context, no groupthink.
Cross-Check: each engine then reviews the other's findings against your actual code and marks them confirmed / rejected / uncertain.
You get findings with severity, file:line, a failure scenario, and a concrete fix — with the false positives already filtered out.
A few things I care about:
Read-only. The engines can read and grep — never execute, write, or fetch. Your code is analyzed, not touched.
No subscription. Prepaid credits that never expire. Debugging is bursty; paying monthly for it never made sense to me.
4 free credits on signup — enough to run a full cross-check and see if it earns your trust.
It's honest about being an assistant, not an oracle — AI findings can be wrong, so it shows you the reasoning and lets you decide. Cross-Check just means far fewer wrong ones reach you.
I'd genuinely love your feedback — especially edge cases where it surprises you (good or bad). Ask me anything 🐛
→ https://botbugger.bot
one thing that would make this way more useful for me would be the ability to whitelist certain false positive patterns per project, since style debates between the two models will probably come up a lot in larger codebases.
Finally got two AI agents to argue with each other on my behalf and they actually found a race condition I had missed for weeks. The mutual verification step feels like having a second pair of eyes that refuses to sign off until the fix really makes sense.
ran it on a gnarly legacy module and the two agents actually caught a race condition i had been chasing for days, with a fix that just worked. feels like a second pair of senior eyes without the meeting.
About BotBugger on Product Hunt
“Two AI engines hunt bugs — and cross-check each other”
BotBugger was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 4 comments, placing #150 on the daily leaderboard. Claude Code and Codex analyze your code adversarially and verify each other's findings. Real bugs, concrete fixes.
BotBugger was featured in SaaS (43.1k followers), Developer Tools (515.9k followers) and Artificial Intelligence (473.7k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 233k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted BotBugger?
BotBugger was hunted by Daniel Seelhofer. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how BotBugger stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.
Daniel Seelhofer