This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
BotBugger
Two AI engines hunt bugs — and cross-check each other
Claude Code and Codex analyze your code adversarially and verify each other's findings. Real bugs, concrete fixes.
Hi Product Hunt 👋
I'm Daniel, a solo dev from Switzerland. Botbugger started as my own QA ritual: before shipping, I'd run my code past two different AI tools and only trust a bug when both agreed. The second opinion caught things the first missed — and, just as importantly, threw out the confident-but-wrong ones.
The problem with a single AI reviewer is noise. It'll hand you ten "critical" issues, and half are hallucinated. You end up debugging the reviewer instead of your code.
Botbugger's idea is simple: don't trust one AI — make two check each other.
Here's how it works:
Point it at a Git repo or a live website URL.
Claude Code and Codex analyze it independently — no shared context, no groupthink.
Cross-Check: each engine then reviews the other's findings against your actual code and marks them confirmed / rejected / uncertain.
You get findings with severity, file:line, a failure scenario, and a concrete fix — with the false positives already filtered out.
A few things I care about:
Read-only. The engines can read and grep — never execute, write, or fetch. Your code is analyzed, not touched.
No subscription. Prepaid credits that never expire. Debugging is bursty; paying monthly for it never made sense to me.
4 free credits on signup — enough to run a full cross-check and see if it earns your trust.
It's honest about being an assistant, not an oracle — AI findings can be wrong, so it shows you the reasoning and lets you decide. Cross-Check just means far fewer wrong ones reach you.
I'd genuinely love your feedback — especially edge cases where it surprises you (good or bad). Ask me anything 🐛
→ https://botbugger.bot
About BotBugger on Product Hunt
“Two AI engines hunt bugs — and cross-check each other”
BotBugger was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 4 comments, placing #150 on the daily leaderboard. Claude Code and Codex analyze your code adversarially and verify each other's findings. Real bugs, concrete fixes.
On the analytics side, BotBugger competes within SaaS, Developer Tools and Artificial Intelligence — topics that collectively have 1M followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how BotBugger performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted BotBugger?
BotBugger was hunted by Daniel Seelhofer. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of BotBugger including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
Daniel Seelhofer