This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
ReguLattice is an AI-native governance platform that helps organizations discover, assess, govern, monitor, and improve AI systems and AI agents. It finds shadow AI, keeps people in charge of high-risk AI decisions, and maintains live, audit-ready evidence mapped to ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act.
Hi everyone, I’m Moazzam, the maker of ReguLattice, from Karachi.
Companies are starting to let AI agents answer customers, change records and move money. I kept seeing the same gap: most AI governance is documents and dashboards that describe risk after the fact, and nothing stops a bad action while it’s happening.
So we built a gateway that sits in front of the AI. Every prompt, agent tool call and AI payment gets an answer: ALLOW, SIGN_OFF (a named person approves) or BLOCK. The answer comes from fixed rules, not another model, and if the gateway is down, the action doesn’t run. Every decision goes into a signed record that an auditor can check offline, without trusting us. It can also find AI tools your team uses without approval, and it can run entirely on your own servers with local models.
In our own red-team test, 215 attacks on the payments gateway were all blocked or held, and all 40 genuine payments went through. That is our own test, not an independent audit, and we have no revenue yet.
The sandbox asks for a name and email before it opens, so we can follow up with people who try it.
Who it’s for: teams in banks, fintechs and other regulated companies that want to use AI agents but must show a regulator that they’re in control.
I’d really like your feedback on two things: which attack should we try next, and what would you need to see before trusting a tool like this in front of your AI agents?
No comment highlights available yet. Please check back later!
About ReguLattice AI Governance Platform on Product Hunt
“AI Governance Platform for AI Systems & Agents”
ReguLattice AI Governance Platform was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 2 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #159 on the daily leaderboard. ReguLattice is an AI-native governance platform that helps organizations discover, assess, govern, monitor, and improve AI systems and AI agents. It finds shadow AI, keeps people in charge of high-risk AI decisions, and maintains live, audit-ready evidence mapped to ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act.
ReguLattice AI Governance Platform was featured in Developer Tools (522.4k followers), Artificial Intelligence (482.7k followers) and Tech (636k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 398.3k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted ReguLattice AI Governance Platform?
ReguLattice AI Governance Platform was hunted by Moazzam Waheed. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how ReguLattice AI Governance Platform stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.
Moazzam Waheed
Hi everyone, I’m Moazzam, the maker of ReguLattice, from Karachi.
Companies are starting to let AI agents answer customers, change records and move money. I kept seeing the same gap: most AI governance is documents and dashboards that describe risk after the fact, and nothing stops a bad action while it’s happening.
So we built a gateway that sits in front of the AI. Every prompt, agent tool call and AI payment gets an answer: ALLOW, SIGN_OFF (a named person approves) or BLOCK. The answer comes from fixed rules, not another model, and if the gateway is down, the action doesn’t run. Every decision goes into a signed record that an auditor can check offline, without trusting us. It can also find AI tools your team uses without approval, and it can run entirely on your own servers with local models.
In our own red-team test, 215 attacks on the payments gateway were all blocked or held, and all 40 genuine payments went through. That is our own test, not an independent audit, and we have no revenue yet.
The sandbox asks for a name and email before it opens, so we can follow up with people who try it.
Who it’s for: teams in banks, fintechs and other regulated companies that want to use AI agents but must show a regulator that they’re in control.
I’d really like your feedback on two things: which attack should we try next, and what would you need to see before trusting a tool like this in front of your AI agents?