Omnia Insights turns any prompt you track into a prioritized action plan to improve your visibility in AI engines. Each plan includes impact level, why it matters, how to implement, and the citation gaps to close.
Hey Product Hunt 👋
Daniel here, cofounder of Omnia. We're back a few months after our last launch, when this community pushed us to #3 Product of the Day. Thank you for that, seriously.
The feedback we kept hearing afterwards was the same: "Omnia shows me where I'm invisible in ChatGPT, cool. But what do I do about it?"
So we're launching the answer: Insights.
What it does?
Pick any prompt you're tracking. Pick the engine where you want to improve. Omnia generates a prioritized action plan, built from your real citation data.
Each action includes:
❓ Action type: owned content, third-party outreach, technical SEO, social, and more.
🎯 Impact level: how much this task is likely to move your visibility.
🧠 Why it matters: the reasoning, pulled from the real citation data behind the prompt.
🛠️ How to implement: concrete steps you can hand to a writer or dev.
🔍 Citation gaps: the specific sources citing competitors but not you, including the ones shaping sentiment around your brand.
Why now?
Monitoring AI visibility has become table stakes. Most tools, including ours until today, stop there. The next step is acting on it without spending 6 hours doing manual citation analysis per prompt.
That's the gap Insights closes.
Who it's for?
Content and marketing teams, SEO leads, in-house marketers, and agencies running AI visibility for multiple brands. Anyone who's tired of staring at a dashboard wondering what to ship next.
Huge thanks to everyone who gave us feedback after the last launch. Insights exists because of it.
Drop questions in the comments, I'll be here all day 🙌
The action plan format is the right call. Most AI visibility tools stop at monitoring — you can see where you're underrepresented but don't know what to actually change. Running marketing for a B2B services company, the gap between "here's your visibility score" and "here's the exact content move to make" is where we lose confidence in a tool. Curious whether the plans adjust based on domain age and existing citation history, or if it's a one-size approach.
What works for ChatGPT visibility doesn't necessarily work for Perplexity. Are the action plans tailored per engine? Congrats on the launch!
Hey, went through Insights by Omnia and the brand-in-LLM-answers tracking is a smart wedge. one thing I wanted to ask, given LLM outputs vary call to call, how do you measure visibility, are you running sampled prompts on a schedule or do you have something more deterministic under the hood?
That’s helpful — the tagging is exactly the piece I was hoping existed.
The next thing I’d watch is whether the insight carries enough “why this owner” context when it gets shared. A content person, SEO lead, and partnerships/PR person may all see the same citation gap, but each needs a different next action and confidence level. If the share/export preserves that owner-specific reasoning, it becomes much easier to hand off instead of just discuss.
Strong direction — monitoring without a next action is where teams tend to stall.
One thing I’d look for in the action plan is a clean split between “create or update owned content” and “earn/repair external citations.” They usually have different owners, timelines, and success signals. Are you exposing that split clearly in the plan/export so content, SEO, and partnerships/PR can each pick up their part?
I’ve tested more than 10 similar services. Everyone focuses on internal website optimization, and very few show which data ChatGPT was trained on, even though external sources are the most important once the site itself is already optimized. Can you show external websites and specific pages on them that were included in the model’s training and where information about us should be added?
Love this Guys!! Btw, does it track visibility down by country/market too, or is it focused on global signals for now?
Let's go! Congrats on the launch 🚀
How long do I need to monitor a prompt before I can get an insight?
Love this feature!
What a great work from the whole team building it!
About Insights by Omnia on Product Hunt
“Step-by-step action plans to improve your AI visibility.”
Insights by Omnia launched on Product Hunt on May 19th, 2026 and earned 148 upvotes and 25 comments, placing #10 on the daily leaderboard. Omnia Insights turns any prompt you track into a prioritized action plan to improve your visibility in AI engines. Each plan includes impact level, why it matters, how to implement, and the citation gaps to close.
Insights by Omnia was featured in Marketing (464.3k followers) and Artificial Intelligence (469.9k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 170.1k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted Insights by Omnia?
Insights by Omnia was hunted by Ben Lang. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how Insights by Omnia stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.
Ben Lang