Ogoron

Your best QA team — 9x faster, 20х cheaper

Software Engineering

Developer Tools

Artificial Intelligence

Visit WebsiteSee on Product Hunt

Can I set up automated weekly QA health reports to stakeholders? Saves me from manual updates.

congrats with the launch, guys! how do you evaluate a complex product like this? any benchmarks/metrics you can share?

"9x faster, 20x cheaper" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that tagline, and I'm curious where those numbers come from and what the baseline looks like.

A team of three humans running manual regression cycles, or a mix of Cypress and a part-time QA contractor? The claim lands very differently depending on what you're replacing.

The angle I am finding genuinely interesting is test maintenance. That's where automated QA silently falls apart. Tools generate tests fine, but when the product changes, someone still has to fix everything that broke. If Ogoron is actually handling that loop autonomously, that's the real differentiator, not the generation part.

Lastly, I'm also wondering how it handles logic that lives outside the UI, i.e., complex business rules, edge cases that aren't obvious from the interface or the codebase alone. That's usually where a human QA engineer earns their salary, and it'd be good to know where the ceiling is.

Congrats on the launch, Elena and team.

Are educational discounts/demo available? I teach a software engineering course at HSE and some advanced students might be interested in demo!

Curious how it handles edge cases and unexpected flows .That’s usually where automated QA tools start to break down.

Cool! the bit that caught my attention is the test maintenance claim. most AI testing tools i've tried are decent at generating tests, but they go stale fast. and then you're spending more time fixing the tests than fixing the product. curious how Ogoron handles it when the UI changes significantly, like a nav restructure or a renamed flow? does it detect drift automatically, or does someone still need to nudge it? that's genuinely the hardest part of QA automation in my experience, so would love to know how you've tackled it.

@yanakazantseva1 Congrats on the launch!

Yana from Ogoron came and left a genuinely thoughtful comment on our AgentPulse launch today, on their own launch day. That kind of generosity says everything about the people building this. The product speaks for itself too, automated test coverage that keeps up as your product evolves is one of those things you don't realize you desperately need until you have it. Wishing you all the best today

How quickly can I get help if the integration fails? Our release is time‑sensitive

Does it learn from past bugs to improve future test generation? We had a recurring issue with timezone handling - would it catch that next time?

Does it support Dockerized applications and container orchestration tools like Kubernetes or AWS ECS? Most of our stack runs in containers.

How „smart“ is the analysis? Does it really understand business logic? We have complex financial rules - would love to know how deep it goes.

Just finished the Ogoron trial - very impressed! Setup took just a couple of hours with your template. It caught two long‑standing bugs we’d missed. The dashboard is clear and JUnit XML export worked perfectly. Moving to the paid plan - thanks for a great tool!

Hi everyone! I’m the Chief Marketing Officer at Ogoron 

We built this product to change how we ship. As a team with a strong development background, we were tired of slow releases, constant regression risks, and heavy QA cycles.

So over the last few months, we created a tool that reads your code, generates test cases, and keeps regression coverage up to date. Now we ship features to production faster, with close to zero bugs, and no longer think about scaling our QA team.

Would love to hear your thoughts and really appreciate your support.

Can it handle repos with a history of 10 000+ commits? We’ve been building our app for 5 years.

Does it work with Cypress instead of Playwright for UI tests? Our team has invested heavily in Cypress and would prefer not to rewrite everything.

bold claim. curious where this breaks - QA automation typically hits hard exceptions fast when scope expands. what's the failure recovery model?