In Parallel MCP

Your context, available to every agent.

Productivity

Meetings

Artificial Intelligence

Vercel Day

Visit WebsiteSee on Product Hunt

every "single source of truth for the org" tool I've seen eventually turns into the thing everyone stops updating, then it's worse than no source at all because people trust a stale answer. how does In Parallel keep goals/ownership actually current without someone manually maintaining it, is it pulling straight from where the work happens (tickets, docs, calendars) or does it still rely on people logging updates

The "explain your company once and every agent already knows it" pitch nails the actual daily tax of re-pasting context into each new chat. Where does that shared context actually live: a hosted store on your side, or something I control and can host in my own environment? And how does it stay current: does it auto-derive decisions and ownership from the connected tools, or does someone have to curate what goes in? With permission-scoped MCP access, is scoping per-user so an agent only sees what that person could see, or is it one org-wide context every connected tool can read?

Congratulations on the launch! Solving the context problem for organizations with information moving faster than ever is a big deal! Heck, just figuring out how to manage my own personal context as a solo builder to make the most out of AI has it's challenges.

Every comment here is about big teams so let me ask from the other side. I am a one person company and I still lose context between Claude Code sessions every single day. Is this built only for organizations or does it make sense for a solo builder too?

Congrats on the launch, Kristian! The concept of standardizing the shared context layer over MCP is brilliant. A major pain point with centralized team hubs is 'context drift'—a decision is made in Slack, the execution changes in GitHub, but the overarching context file stays static. How does In Parallel natively capture those micro-updates without forcing team members to manually edit the shared state every single day? Is it passively listening to integrations?

As a CPO this hits a nerve 😅 The gap between "what we decided in the room" and "what's actually on the roadmap" is where half my week disappears. Every tool captures something — notes, tickets, docs — but the decision itself always seems to fall through the cracks. Love that In Parallel sits underneath instead of adding yet another surface to babysit. Pricing per workspace instead of per seat is the right call too. Congrats on the launch, upvoted 🚀

The portability problem is the real one: context trapped in each tool means every agent is a stranger. Building on MCP is the right bet because it standardizes that layer instead of locking it to one app. The test will be keeping context fresh, stale shared context is worse than none.

SOC 2 Type II for an MCP context layer is exactly the boring enterprise signal I'd look for

This bit me two weeks ago, a rule I set at planning stage silently disappeared before the generation step and the output invented a fact. Took a day to find where the context died. So, real question: two agents pull the same context, one updates it mid-task, what happens? Last write wins or something smarter?

Really interesting approach to the LLM memory bottleneck standard custom instructions are too static, and vector databases get too noisy. Does your self-hosted VPC setup allow us to restrict sensitive context folders so only specific teams (like HR or Finance) can query them?

One thing that would make this a no-brainer for me is a mobile companion app. Most of my context-switching happens away from my desk, and being able to quickly check on goals, risks, or ownership changes from my phone would keep me aligned even when I'm not at my laptop. A simple read-only view with the ability to flag updates would be enough.