This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
Who's Right?
The Clinical AI that analyzes your relationship fights fair
Who's Right? is a free AI that analyses relationship arguments and tells both people what they got right, what they got wrong, and what's actually underneath the fight Both sides submit separately. Nobody edits each others version.The AI runs it through Gottman, Attachment Theory, and CBT frameworks and gives you three cards: Your Point, Their Point, and What You Both Missed. No signup. Free. No data stored.
The real story- I kept having the same argument with my girlfriend and was convinced I was right. So I actually read Gottman, attachment theory, CBT, not to understand the relationship, but to win. The research showed I was the problem in most of them.
Felt worth building into something. The two-sided submission is the thing I'm most proud of, neither person can see or edit the other's version before the AI runs it. You can't game it (Feel free to test it and tell me if you can)
The "What You Both Missed" card is the one that usually lands hardest. Most fights aren't actually about what they're about.
Would love to hear from anyone who's done couples therapy Im curious whether the clinical framing holds up or if I've missed something obvious.
About Who's Right? on Product Hunt
“The Clinical AI that analyzes your relationship fights fair”
Who's Right? was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 1 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #158 on the daily leaderboard. Who's Right? is a free AI that analyses relationship arguments and tells both people what they got right, what they got wrong, and what's actually underneath the fight Both sides submit separately. Nobody edits each others version.The AI runs it through Gottman, Attachment Theory, and CBT frameworks and gives you three cards: Your Point, Their Point, and What You Both Missed. No signup. Free. No data stored.
On the analytics side, Who's Right? competes within Artificial Intelligence, Social Impact and Health — topics that collectively have 475.8k followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how Who's Right? performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted Who's Right??
Who's Right? was hunted by Jackson. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of Who's Right? including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
Jackson
I'm Jack, I built this.
The real story- I kept having the same argument with my girlfriend and was convinced I was right. So I actually read Gottman, attachment theory, CBT, not to understand the relationship, but to win. The research showed I was the problem in most of them.
Felt worth building into something. The two-sided submission is the thing I'm most proud of, neither person can see or edit the other's version before the AI runs it. You can't game it (Feel free to test it and tell me if you can)
The "What You Both Missed" card is the one that usually lands hardest. Most fights aren't actually about what they're about.
Would love to hear from anyone who's done couples therapy Im curious whether the clinical framing holds up or if I've missed something obvious.