This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
SixSentences_
Open AI research workspace where every claim is traceable
SixSentences connects literature search, AI screening, interviews, surveys, analysis, citations and LaTeX writing. AI decisions stay verifiable, humans stay in control. Apache 2.0, self-hostable, no telemetry or feature gates. Your models, your budget. Feedback welcome! π
Hi everyone,
I'm a master's student in Germany and spend most of my week on research. Most of that time went into moving things between tools: a reference manager, a spreadsheet, a survey tool, a transcription service, and finally LaTeX. Every handoff lost context, and once AI entered the workflow it got worse. A number or a citation would show up in a draft and I could no longer say where it came from.
SixSentences puts those steps in one workspace: literature search and screening, research data and figures, surveys and text or spoken interviews with explicit consent and retention gates, and a LaTeX writing environment. What matters is what survives between them. Sources, transformations and decisions stay inspectable, so a figure or a citation in the manuscript can be traced back to the record it came from. AI steps are optional and run against the providers, budgets and data-processing rules the operator sets. The screening models are fine-tuned transformer encoders I trained myself, not a prompt.
It is Apache-2.0 and self-hostable: clone, make up, done. This is an early alpha, so APIs and UI can still change, and I would much rather hear about the rough edges now than after 1.0.
Which part of your research workflow is currently the least traceable?
About SixSentences_ on Product Hunt
βOpen AI research workspace where every claim is traceableβ
SixSentences_ was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 2 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #153 on the daily leaderboard. SixSentences connects literature search, AI screening, interviews, surveys, analysis, citations and LaTeX writing. AI decisions stay verifiable, humans stay in control. Apache 2.0, self-hostable, no telemetry or feature gates. Your models, your budget. Feedback welcome! π
On the analytics side, SixSentences_ competes within Open Source, Education, Artificial Intelligence and GitHub β topics that collectively have 668.5k followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how SixSentences_ performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted SixSentences_?
SixSentences_ was hunted by Lukas Buck. A βhunterβ on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform β uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of SixSentences_ including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
Lukas Buck